Thursday, March 15, 2012

Early Burlesque Performers

These photographs, published here, are from the collection of Professor Charles H. McClaghy. They were bought to my attention by James Michael Folks. Thanks, Michael!






















Sunday, March 4, 2012

There's Something About Ernie Bushmiller...

...that gets under my skin.

When I was young and would devour the Sunday Funnies, I almost always skipped Nancy, Bushmiller's signature cartoon strip. Other cities' newspapers still carried Fritzi Ritz, an earlier strip featuring Nancy's glamorous aunt, but here in DC, it was Nancy, Nancy, Nancy. I just didn't get it, I mean, what was there to get? Bushmiller struck me even then, when I was about eight or nine, as a square from squaresville (the place where all the squares lived.)

I also couldn't understand why any cartoonist would invent a character that had to have all those little hairs drawn around her head. Surely it had to have taken hours, I thought. The idea that anyone would want take that kind of time drawing all those little hairs over and over and over almost repulsed me. Obviously this was early evidence of my short attention span, a trait that has dogged my entire life.

But it didn't dog Ernie's life. The precision of his line now strikes me as startling- so clean, so decisive. There's a geometry to his layouts and finishes unlike any other strips at the time. What started as a more or less typical post '20's pin-up based strip ended up as a surreal look at society ostensibly told through a little girl's eyes, but actually told through an adult man with a sensibility divorced from all the reality going on around him.

Oddly enough, Ernie's concepts began to really gel for me in the '60's as I became a devotee of underground comics, especially the work of R Crumb (as readers of L by L know). My earlier posts have tended to emphasize this, especially in some of the Sluggo panels I've reproduced.

Of course the best part of Bushmiller's surreality was that it was completely unintentional. He was just a weird young guy and then he was just a weird old guy.

Like the most perfect of Zen gags, Bushmiller's strips seemed to be about nothing: everyday life lived by everyday characters with some mysterious access to a plethora of everyday objects that you never heard of such as invisible hammocks and flying saucers. Well. maybe you've heard of flying saucers, but I doubt they've ever landed in your back yard.

The strangest concept to me was the character of Sluggo- an orphan kid who lived by himself in an apparently abandoned house. Was he tough? He looked tough, he had the requisite "dese, dem, dose"- tough- kid- from- Brooklyn accent, but he was often dogged by bullies that seemed to really scare him. And where did he get that haircut? You'd have to shave your head every other day to get a haircut like that (again- the little tiny hairs).

Sluggo is by far the most interesting person in the Nancy world. (Nancy is the least interesting.)

I often muse about Fritzi Ritz, Nancy's uber- sexy aunt and guardian. Bushmiller started as a pin-up artist and Aunt Fritzi is his finest creation. No matter what the era, she remains a product of the '30's and '40's, all curvy lines, pouty red lips and seamed stockings. But how did Fritzi end up with Nancy? Was her sister Nancy's mother? Or was it her brother? Were they killed? In some sort of automobile accident? Or did they just abandon Nancy? There's a long line of cartoon characters that have nieces or nephews to take care of, like Popeye with Sweetpea or Donald Duck with Huey, Dewey and Louie, or Popeye again with those three obnoxious nephews. (Wait- was Sweetpea Olive's nephew?)

No wonder fat little Nancy has that eating disorder. Wrenched from her parents at such an early age, confronted by the beauty of her aunt, and with only an abandoned orphan for a friend- what a world! Of course, that's just my version of her world. Bushmiller's is much different.

Ultimately Bushmiller surrendered that world to the great comics writer John Stanley in the run of Dell's Nancy comics. Stanley, who was responsible for the wonderful Litte Lulu comics of our youth, broadened Bushmiller's concepts; introduced  a much larger cast, like Oona, the little girl in the haunted house; tamed Aunt Fritzi's image and generally made a very entertaining universe.

But unlike Little Lulu, the concept of Nancy didn't really need tinkering. Stanley's Nancy is calculated and slightly self- conscious. Bushmiller's is straight from the id, and decidedly un- self conscious.

Here, thanks to the wonderful Mr.Door Tree are a bunch of Nancy's (and Fritzi's) brought to you by the great Ernie Bushmiller.

First, let's meet Ernie:



I'm not sure, but I think he's reading one of John Stanley's Nancy's.

Here we go:


From the early Fritzi Ritz daily strips















Maybe my all- time favorite!















Monday, February 27, 2012

My Friend Oscar

My seventh- grade teacher teacher Stan Sofield once had us parse a sentence that began, "My friend, Oscar of the Waldorf...." Unfortunately that's all I can remember. Now, why would that sentence fragment stay with me all these years?  Who knows- it's not the point anyway.

The point is, Oscar is a funny name, especially as used by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences.  And, not only is it a funny name, but the ceremony bearing the name has become a moribund, tedious and strangely technically inept awards show now that we are truly in the 21st century.

First, the technically inept part- am I the only person listening who kept hearing this strangely buzzing sound underneath the audio? A kind of metallic feedback that accompanied every word spoken? Apparently not- Google has over 169,000,000 results in a search titled "Bad oscar sound". One listener compared the sound to the vuvuzelas at the World Cup Soccer games.

Experts claim that it was not apparent in the hall itself, only in the broadcast signal. Oh, okay then- just so the three or four hundred pampered guests weren't annoyed. Everything's fine then.

You'd think that if we could (at one point) put a couple of men on the moon, we might be able to broadcast a show about technical excellence in the media without annoying muffled vuvuzela sound. But, no, I guess not. (At least I got to use the completely illogical "man on the moon" complaint.)

Conclusion- no Emmy for Oscar.

I also noticed that the orchestra was placed in different loges located in the balconies of the theater. I've attended enough advertising and corporate meetings to recognize this as one of those stupid ideas that someone thinks is really "different" and "creative" and that everyone who works for that person says, "Wow, boss- what an idea!" and then goes home to their spouse and says, "My boss has got to be one of the biggest morons I know." I'm pretty sure the orchestra couldn't even see each other but it didn't really matter because of the annoying buzz in the sound which rendered everything they played painfully inaudible.

Billy Crystal looked stuffed. Thyroid condition maybe?

As for the awards themselves, well... some people were clearly and movingly thrilled to be selected. Meryl "Weepy" Streep's speech where she thanked her hair person was a breath of fresh air. Angelina Jolie looked great for a woman who has adopted 50 or so children- she's really kept her figure, and made sure we all knew it too.

Jean Dujardin, who allegedly said, "Fuck" in French during his acceptance speech, mentioned the great Douglas Fairbanks, a guy who probably enjoyed doing the act Dujardin mentioned.

This year I actually saw three of the contenders. The Artist and Hugo, were both about a time of the cinema that was new, wonderful, exciting and visionary. Midnight in Paris was a nostalgic romp through an amazing era in early 20th century France. They were all, I thought, terrific films, truly entertaining and all three were filled longing for times long gone.

What is that supposed to tell us about now?

Oscar of the Waldorf